Archive for the ‘The Castle’ Category

Dissertation: Introduction

Posted: April 3, 2014 in Dissertation

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

Dissertation: Part 1

Posted: April 3, 2014 in Dissertation

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

Dissertation: Part 2

Posted: April 3, 2014 in Dissertation

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

Dissertation: Part 3

Posted: April 3, 2014 in Dissertation

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

Dissertation: Part 4

Posted: April 3, 2014 in Dissertation

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

Dissertation: Conclusion

Posted: April 3, 2014 in Dissertation

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

[Disclaimer: This essay was written for a secular, academic audience (ie. the markers). I hope you do not find any of the opinions, ideas, or language used here to be offensive to you or your beliefs. They may or may not reflect my own point of view.] (more…)

[Feedback gave the whole essay a good wrap.  Engagement in the etymology of ‘Monotheism’ would have been interesting.  It was also suggested that Chapter and Section numbers could have been included.  Mark: 69 B+]   (more…)


[The teacher was pleased with the manner of research, the structure of the essay, and the overall independent expression of opinion and concept.  He did note that I did not use page numbers in some of my references.  This is an accepted practice in modern referencing but perhaps traditional teachers expect this.  I excluded them because where I did not use them I was quoting whole sections or multiple sections of a book, and including the page numbers would have been obsolete.  Mark: 65 B+]   (more…)


[Feedback suggested a nice look into an interesting subject matter with relevant sources.  There were many suggestions of specifics, such as the valid difference between the Vedic ritualists and Purvamimamsas; the scriptural development could have been reduced to a footnote; and a subtitle would have been appropriate.  Mark: 64 B]   (more…)